Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 75, Issue 4 , Pages 231-240 , April 2004

Comparisons of dynamic retinoscopy measurements with a print card, a video display terminal, and a PRIO® System Tester as test targets

  • Douglas K. Penisten, O.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • College of Optometry, Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, Oklahoma
    • ,
  • David A. Goss, O.D., Ph.D., FCOVDR

      Affiliations

    • School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Indiana University School of Optometry 800 East Atwater Avenue Bloomington, Indiana 47405.
    • ,
  • Greg Philpott, O.D.

      Affiliations

    • College of Optometry, Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, Oklahoma
    • ,
  • Anthony Pham, O.D.

      Affiliations

    • College of Optometry, Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, Oklahoma
    • ,
  • Roger W. West, O.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • College of Optometry, Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, Oklahoma

References 

  1. Sheedy JE. Vision problems at video display terminals: a survey of optometrists. J AM OPTOM ASSOC. 1992;63:687–692
  2. Sheedy JE, Parsons SD. The video display terminal eye clinic: clinical report. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:622–626
  3. Scheiman M. Accommodative and binocular vision disorders associated with video display terminals: diagnosis and management issues. J AM OPTOM ASSOC. 1996;67:531–539
  4. Daum KM. Accommodative response. In:  Eskridge JB,  Amos JF,  Bartlett JD editor. Clinical procedures in optometry. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1991;p. 677–686
  5. Rouse MW, London R, Allen DC. An evaluation of the monocular estimate method of dynamic retinoscopy. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982;59:234–239
  6. Haynes HM. Clinical approaches to nearpoint power determination. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985;62:375–385
  7. Goss DA. Clinical accommodation testing. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1992;3:78–82
  8. Carlson NB, Kurtz D, Heath DA, et al. Clinical procedures for ocular examination. 2nd ed.. Stamford, Conn.: Appleton & Lange; 1996;198-200
  9. Salibello C. Comparing a printed image and a Gaussian image diagnostic system. J Behav Optom. 1994;5(59-61):67
  10. Burns DH. Characteristics of visual display units that may cause visual difficulties. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1995;15:99–104
  11. Kolker D, Hutchinson R, Nilsen E. Comparison of tests of accommodation for computer users. Optometry. 2002;73:212–220
  12. Wick B, Morse S. Accommodative accuracy to video display monitors. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(12s):218
  13. Sorkin RE, Reich LN, Pizzimenti J. Accommodative response to PRIO® Computer Vision Tester versus printed text. Optometry. 2003;74:782–786
  14. Sheedy JE, Shaw-McMinn PG. Diagnosing and treating computer-related vision problems. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003;185
  15. Locke LC, Somers W. A comparison study of dynamic retinoscopy techniques. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:540–544
  16. del Pilar Cacho M, García-Munoz A, García-Bernabeu JR, et al. Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:650–656
  17. García A, Cacho P. MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy in patients with disorders of vergence and accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:214–220
  18. McKee GW. Reliability of monocular estimate method retinoscopy. Optom Monthly. 1981;72(12):30–31
  19. McClelland JF, Saunders KJ. The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003;23:243–250
  20. Rosenfield M, Portello JK, Blustein GH, et al. Comparison of clinical techniques to assess the near accommodative response. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:382–388
  21. Cooper S. Normative analysis. Lecture note outline. Pacific University; 2003;
  22. Jackson TW, Goss DA. Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children. J AM OPTOM ASSOC. 1991;62:857–866

PII: S1529-1839(04)70050-0

doi: 10.1016/S1529-1839(04)70050-0

Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 75, Issue 4 , Pages 231-240 , April 2004

Article Tools