Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 75, Issue 7 , Pages 445-451, July 2004

Educating the educators: increasing grade-school teachers’ ability to detect vision problems

  • Ira Krumholtz, O.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: SUNY State College of Optometry, 33 West 42nd Street New York, New York 10036.

State University of New York, College of Optometry, New York, New York

Article Outline

Background

The State University of New York College of Optometry/University Optometric Center conducts vision screenings in various public schools in New York City. A study was devised to determine whether teachers’ abilities to detect vision problems in their students could be enhanced.

Methods

Students of two different grade schools were screened, in 1998–1999 and again two years later. In 1998–1999, the week before each group of students was to be screened, teachers were asked to indicate which children were felt to have vision problems. In 2000–2001, prior to the screenings, a lecture on vision and its relationship to learning was given to the same teachers who had responded two years earlier, and handouts and brochures delineating vision problems were also given to each teacher. A comparison was then made of the teachers’ ability to detect vision problems before and after the teacher education.

Results

In the first year, 111 of 377 of children screened (29%) were referred. Teachers correctly identified 39% of the acuity failures and 29% of the functional failures. Two years later, a total of 31% of children were referred. The same teachers correctly identified 68% of the acuity failures and 67% of the functional failures.

Conclusions

There was a statistically significant increase in the ability of teachers to correctly identify children with learning problems based on education. Both the accuracy of identifying children with acuity problems, as well as identifying children with functional visual problems, increased. Based on these results, it is recommended that an in-service lecture be given to school teachers to heighten their awareness of vision problems that may impact learning performance.

Key words: Children, education, learning, schools, teacher referrals, vision screening

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Bailey RN. Assessing the predictive ability of the test: positive findings of an elementary school vision screening. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:682–691
  2. Cohen A, Lieberman S, et al. The NYSOA Vision Screening Battery–a total approach. J AM OPTOM ASSOC. 1983;54:979–984
  3. Thomson WD, Evans B. A new approach to vision screenings in schools. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19:196–209
  4. Educator's Guide to Classroom Vision Problems. Santa Ana, Calif.: Optometric Extension Program, 1985.
  5. Goldman R, Sapp GL, Foster AS. Reading achievement by learning disabled students in resource room and regular classes. Percept Mot Skills. 1998;86:192–194
  6. Glascoe FP. Can teachers’ global ratings identify children with academic problems?. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2001;22:163–168
  7. Krumholtz I. Results from a pediatric vision screening and its ability to predict academic performance. Optometry. 2000;71:426–430
  8. Krumholtz I. Results of a vision screening program: an initial study. J AM OPTOM ASSOC. 1995;66:608–612
  9. Concannon P, Robinson F. Teacher Questionnaire for Vision Problems: is it a help or a hindrance for school health screening?. Aust N ZJ Public Health. 1997;21:37–39
  10. Williams JF. A training program for elementary school teachers: optometrist–teacher communications. J AM OPTOM ASSOC. 1975;46:990–992
  11. Busby RA. Vision development in the classroom. J Learning Disabil. 1985;18:166–172
  12. Kulp MT, Schmidt PP. Visual predictors of reading per formance in kindergarten and 1st grade children. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:255–262

PII: S1529-1839(04)70159-1

doi:10.1016/S1529-1839(04)70159-1

Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 75, Issue 7 , Pages 445-451, July 2004