Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 75, Issue 8 , Pages 503-508, August 2004

Visual acuity through Fresnel, refractive, and hybrid diffractive/refractive prisms

  • Milton Katz, O.D.

      Affiliations

    • katz M. Visual acuity through Fresnel, refractive, and hybrid diffractive/refractivw prisms. Optometry 2004;75:503-8.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding address: SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42nd Street, New York, New York 10036.

State University of New York, College of Optometry, New York, New York

Article Outline

Background

This article compares the effect on visual acuity of the Fresnel and wedge-shaped refractive prisms with newly developed hybrid diffractive/refractive prisms (Com-Prisms™), which combine a wedge-shaped refractive prism with a diffractive component. The diffractive component of hybrid elements can be designed to correct the chromatic aberration of the refractive component.

Methods

The monocular visual acuity of 21 subjects and binocular acuity of 20 subjects were measured with computer-generated logMAR charts. Visual acuity was measured without prisms (NP) and through ComPrisms™, 3M Press-on™ Fresnel, and acrylic refractive prisms of 20A, 30A, and 40A powers.

Results

A repeated measures analysis of variance indicates a significant main effect of treatment (without prisms and through the three types of prisms) at each prism power, both monocularly and binocularly. Results of the Scheffé test for all possible comparisons between pairs of means of the treatments are provided.

Conclusions

Although all the prisms reduced visual acuity, the ComPrisms™ provide significantly better visual acuity than acrylic refractive or 3M Press-on™ Fresnel prisms of equivalent power.

Key words: Chromatic aberration, diffractive/refractive optics, Fresnel prisms, hybrid optics, ophthalmic, prisms, visual acuity

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. 3M Health Care, St. Paul, Minnesota.
  2. Hampton LD, Roth N, Meyer-Arendt , et al. Visual acuity degradation resulting from dispersion in polycar bonate. J AM OPTOM ASSOC. 1991;62:760–765
  3. Katz M. Introduction to geometrical optics. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing; 2002;255-7
  4. Meslin D, Obrecht G. Effect of chromatic dispersion of a lens on visual acuity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65:25–28
  5. Cheng D, Woo GC. The effect of conventional CR39 and Fresnel prisms on high and low contrast acuity. Ophthmol Physiol Opt. 2001;21:312–316
  6. Veronneau-Troutman S. Fresnel prisms and their effects on visual acuity and binocularity. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1978;6:610–653
  7. Flanders M, Sarkis N. Fresnel membrane prisms: clinical experience. Can J Ophthalmol. 1999;34:335–340
  8. Sweatt WC. Describing holographic optical elements aslenses. J Opt Soc Am. 1977;67:803–808
  9. Filtron brand manufactured by Gentex Corp., Carbondale, Pennsylvania 18407.
  10. Woo GC, Campbell FW, Ing B. Effect of Fresnel prism dispersion on contrast sensitivity function. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt. 1986;6:415–418

PII: S1529-1839(04)70175-X

doi:10.1016/S1529-1839(04)70175-X

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association September 2004 (Vol. 75, Issue 9, Page 567)

Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 75, Issue 8 , Pages 503-508, August 2004

Article Tools