Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 81, Issue 8 , Pages 408-413 , August 2010

Ocular pulse amplitude and associated glaucomatous risk factors in a healthy Hispanic population

References 

  1. Leske MC, Wu SY, Nemesure B, et al. Incident open-angle glaucoma and blood pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(7):954–959
  2. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, et al. Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):1965–1972
  3. Leske MC, Wu SY, Hennis A, et al. Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados eye studies. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(1):85–93
  4. Sommer A. Glaucoma risk factors observed in the Baltimore eye survey. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1996;7(2):93–98
  5. Varma R, Ying-Lai M, Francis BA, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino eye study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(8):1439–1448
  6. Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic subjects: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(12):1819–1826
  7. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore eye survey. JAMA. 1991;266(3):369–374
  8. Mitchell P, Hourihan F, Sandbach J, et al. The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains eye study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(10):2010–2015
  9. Wong TY, Klein BE, Klein R, et al. Refractive errors, intraocular pressure, and glaucoma in a white population. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):211–217
  10. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, et al. Family history and risk of primary open angle glaucoma. The Baltimore eye survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(1):69–73
  11. Doshi V, Ying-Lai M, Azen SP, et al. Sociodemographic, family history, and lifestyle risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The Los Angeles Latino eye study. e2 Ophthalmology. 2008;115(4):639–647
  12. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: the Egna-Neumarkt study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(7):1287–1293
  13. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, et al. Hypertension, perfusion pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma. A population-based assessment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(2):216–221
  14. Hulsman CA, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, et al. Blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and open-angle glaucoma: the Rotterdam study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(6):805–812
  15. Meyer JH, Brandi-Dohrn J, Funk J. Twenty four hour blood pressure monitoring in normal tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(10):864–867
  16. Yin ZQ, Vaegan , Millar TJ, et al. Widespread choroidal insufficiency in primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1997;6(1):23–32
  17. Kerr J, Nelson P, O'Brien C. A comparison of ocular blood flow in untreated primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(1):42–51
  18. Halkiadakis I, Patsea E, Chatzimichali K, et al. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice. Acta Opthalmologica. 2009;87(3):323–328
  19. Punjabi OS, Ho HK, Kniestedt C, et al. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31(10):851–862
  20. Schmidt KG, von Ruckmann A, Mittag TW. [Ocular pulse amplitude in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma]. Ophthalmologica. 1998;212(1):5–10
  21. Schmidt KG, Pillunat LE, Kohler K, et al. Ocular pulse amplitude is reduced in patients with advanced retinitis pigmentosa. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(6):678–682
  22. Schmidt KG, von Ruckmann A, Kemkes-Matthes B, et al. Ocular pulse amplitude in diabetes mellitus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(11):1282–1284
  23. Schmidt KG, Ruckmann AV, Mittag TW, et al. Reduced ocular pulse amplitude in low tension glaucoma is independent of vasospasm. Eye. 1997;11(Pt 4):485–488
  24. Perkins ES. The ocular pulse. Curr Eye Res. 1981;1(1):19–23
  25. Stalmans I, Harris A, Vanbellinghen V, et al. Ocular pulse amplitude in normal tension and primary open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(5):403–407
  26. Schwenn O, Troost R, Vogel A, et al. Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(9):981–984
  27. Vulsteke C, Stalmans I, Fieuws S, et al. Correlation between ocular pulse amplitude measured by dynamic contour tonometer and visual field defects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(4):559–565
  28. Weizer JS, Asrani S, Stinnett SS, et al. The clinical utility of dynamic contour tonometry and ocular pulse amplitude. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(8):700–703
  29. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(1):2–6
  30. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, et al. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(8):763–767
  31. Erickson DH, Goodwin D, Rollins M, et al. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude. Optometry. 2009;80(4):169–174
  32. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(4):746–751
  33. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(9):3790–3794
  34. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, et al. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):39–47
  35. Bureau of the Census. Current population reports: population projections of the United States by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1995 to 2050. Available at http://www.census.gov/prod/1/pop/p25-1130/p251130.pdf. Last accessed May 20, 2009.
  36. Pourjavan S, Boelle PY, Detry-Morel M, et al. Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal). Int Ophthalmol. 2007;27(6):357–360
  37. Read SA, Collins MJ, Iskander DR. Diurnal variation of axial length, intraocular pressure, and anterior eye biometrics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(7):2911–2918
  38. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Kao L, et al. The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and Goldmann tonometry. Optom Vision Sci. 2008;85(6):451–456
  39. Grieshaber MC, Katamay R, Gugleta K, et al. Relationship between ocular pulse amplitude and systemic blood pressure measurements. Acta Opthalmologica. 2009;87(3):329–334
  40. Carbonaro F, Andrew T, Mackey DA, et al. The heritability of corneal hysteresis and ocular pulse amplitude: a twin study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1545–1549
  41. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC, et al. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(8):1104–1108
  42. Perkins ES. The ocular pulse and intraocular pressure as a screening test for carotid artery stenosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69(9):676–680
  43. James CB, Trew DR, Clark K, et al. Factors influencing the ocular pulse–axial length. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229(4):341–344
  44. McBrien NA, Gentle A. Role of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia. Progress in Retinal & Eye Research. 2003;22(3):307–338
  45. Silver DM, Geyer O. Pressure-volume relation for the living human eye. Curr Eye Res. 2000;20(2):115–120
  46. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, et al. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the Rotterdam study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123(6):767–772
  47. Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, et al. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(6):969–973
  48. Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL. Intraocular pressure in an American community. The Beaver Dam eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(7):2224–2228
  49. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):20–26
  50. Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(4):288–292
  51. Grieshaber MC, Schoetzau A, Zawinka C, et al. Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(6):740–744
  52. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(4):658–665
  53. La Rosa FA, Gross RL, Orengo-Nania S. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(1):23–27
  54. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(5):868–875
  55. Kempen JH, Mitchell P, Lee KE, et al. The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):495–505
  56. Tarczy-Hornoch K, Ying-Lai M, Varma R, et al. Myopic refractive error in adult Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(5):1845–1852

PII: S1529-1839(10)00249-6

doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2010.02.012

Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 81, Issue 8 , Pages 408-413 , August 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution