Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 81, Issue 9 , Pages 476-484 , September 2010

An analysis of vision screening data from New York City public schools

  • Marie I. Bodack, O.D.

      Affiliations

    • Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Marie I. Bodack, O.D., Cincinnati Children's Hospital, MLC 4008, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039.
  • ,
  • Ida Chung, O.D.

      Affiliations

    • State University of New York State College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Ira Krumholtz, O.D.

      Affiliations

    • State University of New York State College of Optometry, New York, New York

References 

  1. Maternal and Child Health Bureau and National Eye Institute Task Force on Vision Screening in the Preschool Child. Preschool vision screening. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:122–126
  2. Simons K. Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996;41:3–30
  3. Donahue SP, Arnold RW, Ruben JB. Preschool vision screening: what should we be detecting and how should we report it? Uniform guidelines for reporting results of preschool vision screening studies. JAAPOS. 2003;7:314–316
  4. Robinson B, Bobier WR, Martin E, et al. Measurement of the validity of a preschool vision screening program. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:193–198
  5. Ciner EB, Dobson V, Schmidt PP, et al. A survey of vision screening policy of preschool children in the United States. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;43:445–447
  6. Peters HB, Blum HB, Bettman JW, et al. The Orinda vision study. Am J Optom Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;36:455–469
  7. Cohen AH, Lieberman S, Stolzberg M, et al. The NYSOA screening battery—a total approach. J Am Optom Assoc. 1983;54:979–984
  8. Schrier M, Hamakiotes D. School vision screening: a comparison of results from two school populations of differing socioeconomic composition. J Optom Vis Dev. 1993;24:15–20
  9. Krumholtz I. Results of a vision screening program: an initial study. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995;66:608–612
  10. Krumholtz I. Results of a pediatric vision screening program. J Behav Optom. 1996;7:127–129
  11. Krumholtz I. Results from a pediatric vision screening and its ability to predict academic performance. Optometry. 2000;71:426–430
  12. Bailey RN. Assessing the predictive ability of the test-positive findings of an elementary school vision screening. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:682–691
  13. Morse AR, Trief E, Joseph J. Vision screening: a study of 297 head start children. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 1987;81:200–203
  14. Marsh-Tottle WL, Corliss DA, Alvarez SL, et al. A statistical analysis of modified clinical technique vision screening of preschoolers by optometry students. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71:593–603
  15. Marshall EC, Meetz RE, Harmon LL. Through our children's eyes—the public health impact of the vision screening requirements for Indiana school children. Optometry. 2010;81:71–82
  16. Solan HA, Mozlin R. Children in poverty impact on health, visual development, and school failure. J Optom Vis Dev. 1997;28:7–25
  17. Visual impairment and use of eye-care services and protective eyewear among children—United States 2002. MMWR. 2005;54:425–429
  18. Ganz ML, Xuan Z, Hunter DG. Prevalence and correlates of children's diagnosed eye and vision conditions. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2298–2306
  19. National study spotlights disparities in kids vision care (May 5, 2003). Available at: http://www.med.umich/edu/opm/newspage/2003/kidsvision.htm. Last accessed August 6, 2003.
  20. Williamson T, Andrews R, Dutton GN, et al. Assessment of an inner city visual screening programme for preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:1068–1073
  21. Fischback LA, Lee DA, Englehardt RF, et al. The prevalence of ocular disorders among Hispanic and Caucasian children screened by the UCLA mobile eye clinic. J Comm Health. 1993;18:201–211
  22. Voo I, Lee DA, Oelrich FO. Prevalences of ocular conditions among Hispanic, white, Asian, and black immigrant students examined by the UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic. J Am Optom Assoc. 1998;69:255–261
  23. Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African-American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:12299–36
  24. About Head Start. Available at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/hsb/about/index.htmLast accessed March 3, 2006.
  25. New York City Department of Education Welcome to Our Schools. Available at: http://www.nycenet.edu/OurSchools/default.htm. Last accessed December 22, 2004.
  26. Morgan M. The clinical aspects of accommodation and convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1944;21:301–313
  27. Speeg-Schatz C, Lobstein Y, Burget M, et al. A review of preschool vision screening for strabismus and amblyopia in France: 23 years experience in the Alsace region. Binoc Vis Strab Quarterly. 2004;19:151–158
  28. Hered RW, Murphy S, Clancy M. Comparison of the HOTV and lea symbol charts for preschool vision screening. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1997;34:24–28
  29. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group. Visual acuity results in school-aged children and adults: lea symbol chart versus bailey-lovie chart. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:650–654
  30. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and lea symbols acuity test. J AAPOS. 2003;7:396–399
  31. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group. Preschool visual acuity screening with HOTV and lea symbols: testability and between-test agreement. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:678–683
  32. Kvarnstrom G, Jakobsson P. Is vision screening in 3-year-old children feasible? Comparison between the lea symbol chart and the HOTV (lm) chart. Acta Ophthalmolog Scand. 2005;83:76–80
  33. Walline JJ, Sinnot L, Johnson ED, et al. What do kids think about kids in eyeglasses?. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2008;28:212–224
  34. Li L, Song Y, Liu X, et al. Spectacle acceptance among secondary school students in rural China: the Xichang pediatric refractive error study (x-pres)—Report 5. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(7):2895–2902
  35. Maples WC. Visual factors that significantly impact academic performance. Optometry. 2003;74(1):35–39
  36. Simons H, Grisham JD. Binocular anomalies and reading problems. J Am Optom Assoc. 1987;58(7):578–587
  37. Kulp T, Schmidt P. Visual predictors of reading performance in kindergarten and first grade children. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73(4):255–262
  38. Kulp T, Schmidt P. Effect of oculomotor and other visual skills on reading performance: A literature review. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73(4):283–292
  39. Young B, Collier-Gary K, Schwing S. Visual factors: A primary cause of failure in beginning reading. J Optom Vis Dev. 1994;32(1):58–71
  40. Grisham D, Powers M, Riles P. Visual skills of poor readers in high school. Optometry. 2007;78:542–549
  41. Scheiman M, Gallaway M, Coulter R. Prevalence of vision and ocular disorders in a clinical pediatric population. J Am Optom Assoc. 1996;67:193–202
  42. Flax N. General issues. In:  Scheiman MM,  Rouse MW editor. Optometric management of learning-related vision problems. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2006;p. 193–198
  43. Kiely PM, Crewther SG, Crewther DP. Is there an association between functional vision and learning to read?. Clin Exp Optom. 2001;84(6):346–353
  44. Shin HS, Park SC, Park CM. Relationship between accommodative and vergence dysfunctions and academic achievement for primary school children. Ophth Physiol Opt. 2009;Abstract epub ahead of print
  45. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the vision in preschoolers study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:637–650
  46. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group. Testability of preschoolers on stereotests used to screen vision disorders. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:753–757

PII: S1529-1839(10)00276-9

doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2010.05.006

Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association
Volume 81, Issue 9 , Pages 476-484 , September 2010